Unauthorized downloading of digital goods, including copyright music, videos, computer games, and images has become an increasing problem for content providers and those who hold the copyright on such goods and expect remuneration for distribution. A new research study in the International Journal of Business Environment suggests that content providers must take a pragmatic view based on social consensus to persuade illicit downloaders that their behaviour is economically and ethically unacceptable behaviour among their peer group or other social group to which they belong.
illegal
Councils must be allowed to intervene in suspected illegal schools, government adviser warns
Councils must be granted powers to intervene in suspected illegal schools in order to protect vulnerable children, a government adviser has said.
Alan Wood, who is tasked with reviewing the future of local government in education from next year, said radical changes were needed in order to safeguard pupils outside mainstream schools who could be learning in unsafe environments.
Speaking to TES, he said the issue of illegal schools, as well as unregistered schools, was one that was “growing and will not go away unless it’s dealt with”.
He also suggested that new arrangements allowing individual councils to investigate each school could be brought in to help tackle illegal practices more efficiently.
“I certainly don’t think we can continue on without clear guidance as to how local authorities can ascertain what’s happening to children,” he said.
At present, parents can say they are “home educating” a child and are under no obligation to give any further details, or “comply with any of the questions of work or where the education takes place”.
Mr Wood’s call for change follows comments from outgoing Ofsted chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw that it was “bizarre” that local authorities had no powers to find out what is happening to children not in school.
Ofsted has repeatedly warned of the growing numbers of children being taught in illegal schools, which they say pose risks such as unsafe and unhygienic premises.
Mary Bousted, general secretary of the ATL teaching union, said that academisation meant more children fell through the cracks into illegal schools. “How can local authorities take responsibility for all children if they can’t get the numbers excluded from academies?” she said.
The Local Government Association has called for councils to be handed powers to enter people’s homes if they decide to home educate their children.
Last year Ofsted inspectors investigated 162 suspected illegal schools, 32 of which were run by charities or businesses.
It is believed there are many more illegal schools that remain undiscovered, however, and the schools watchdog has estimated there are 1,000 boys currently being taught in unregistered ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools.
A DfE spokesperson said: “Unregistered schools are illegal and unsafe. We have given Ofsted additional resources to root them out and take action through the courts.
“Where children are being put at risk or not receiving a suitable education, local authorities and police have clear powers to intervene.”
[Source:- independent.co.uk]
Councils are calling for powers to enter houses and other premises, such as illegal schools, where home-educated children are being taught.
The Local Government Association says its ability to check if children withdrawn from schools in England and Wales are suitably educated is limited.
Currently, council officers can enter a premises only if they have specific concerns about a child’s safety.
The government said it was “cracking down” on unregistered schools.
Councillor Richard Watts, chairman of the LGA’s Children and Young People Board, said the vast majority of parents who home-educated their children did a fantastic job.
They worked well with their local council to make sure that a good education was being provided, he said.
‘Dangerous buildings’
Concerns have been mounting about children being taught in illegal schools – those offering 20 hours of lessons a week which are not registered with the Department for Education (DfE), education watchdog Ofsted or local authorities.
There are fears some schools may have links to extremists and that lessons may be taught in dangerous buildings.
The chief inspector of Ofsted, Sir Michael Wilshaw, raised the issue in November 2015, and in February this year the DfE said it was investigating 21 such institutions in England.
In Wales, calls have been made for a mandatory home education register after an eight-year-old boy who had no contact with the authorities died from scurvy.
Any parent has the right to withdraw a child from mainstream education without giving a reason.
However, it is the duty of local education authorities to ensure young people in their areas are receiving a suitable education.
‘Limited powers’
Councillor Watts said: “In some cases, a child listed as home-schooled can, in fact, be attending an illegal school.
“With limited powers to check on the work a child is doing, however, councils are unable to find out whether this is the case.
“They work closely with their communities to help identify where illegal schools are, but the ability to enter homes and other premises and speak to children would go a long way towards tackling the problem.”
In May, Sir Michael said Ofsted was looking into 100 suspected illegal schools.
A DfE spokesman said it had “taken steps to ensure the system is as robust as it can be”.
“We have announced an escalation of Ofsted investigations into unregistered schools, with additional inspectors dedicated to rooting them out, a new tougher approach to prosecuting them and a call to local authorities to help identify any settings of concern.”
[Source:- BBC]
Microsoft, Sony, and other companies still use illegal warranty-void-if-removed stickers
One of the ways manufacturers coerce users not to modify or even open hardware they’ve purchased is through warranty-void-if-removed stickers. These stickers are common on electronics equipment — Microsoft uses them on the Xbox One, Sony has them on the PS4, and you’ve probably owned a phone that had at least one somewhere.
These stickers are almost certainly illegal, as Motherboard points out in relation to the new Xbox One S. The problem with the stickers is that they run afoul of the FCC’s rules on tying repair services to specific products. This issue is also probably why Apple agreed to change its practices regarding iPhones, when devices that had been repaired by third-party shops would then suddenly fail when upgraded to Apple’s latest operating system.
“The stickers could be deceptive by implying consumers can’t use parts the warrantor doesn’t pre-approve, which violates the anti-tying provisions of MMWA,” FTC spokesperson Frank Dorman told Vice.
Companies don’t like to talk about these policies, most likely because they don’t want to admit they’ve been doing something illegal for decades. Laws like the 1975 Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act were passed to prevent companies from tying customers to expensive repair contracts, or requiring customers to use only approved hardware installed by “authorized” resellers. The common example for this is with cars, where it’s illegal for a manufacturer to try and force you to only install their own parts.
There are, of course, limits to these laws. If you destroy your transmission or engine while servicing them, the manufacturer is under no obligation to repair the vehicle. What manufacturers aren’t allowed to do is refuse to honor a warranty on your engine just because you installed a different set of speakers or an aftermarket radio. The obligation is on the manufacturer to demonstrate that your third-party repairs or modifications caused the failure, not the other way around.
Modern electronics are tightly integrated, but the concept is the same. Microsoft isn’t allowed to prevent you from opening your own hardware, and neither is any other manufacturer. So why do they?
The answer is simple: Because they know you won’t do anything about it. It’s a nifty example of how companies get away with doing illegal things — the cost of taking them to court and forcing them to comply with the law is higher than the value of the product. A car is expensive enough to repair that companies can’t get away with telling you to pony up thousands of dollars for their own parts and repair shops. On the other hand, a smartphone can cost $500 to $700, but that doesn’t begin to cover the cost of a lawyer to litigate the issue, and Apple, Microsoft, and other companies know it.
In Microsoft’s case, its warranty states that it ceases to apply if the Xbox One is “opened, modified, or tampered with.” It’s flatly illegal. But until someone brings a case against the company and litigates it out, electronics companies will continue to put these stickers on their products, and consumers will continue to believe the manufacturers are legally allowed to do.
The situation is also playing out in new ways thanks to the advent of DRM. Tractor manufacturer John Deere and the Library of Congress have both resisted any attempt to require manufacturers to share data on firmware or other DRM’d blocks of information, because it could conceivably allow for piracy or alter the function of the vehicle. John Deere has gone so far as to claim that by purchasing a tractor, farmers gain “an implied license for the life of the vehicle to operate the vehicle.” It’s the concept of software licensing, except applied to hardware, and the fact that it’s illegal doesn’t seem to concern anyone much.
[Source:- extremetech]
After-hours and weekend work emails may soon become illegal in France. A bill that prevents companies of 50 or more employees from sending emails after typical work hours passed the French lower parliamentary house earlier this week.
The case against after-work emails is that they can cause high levels of stress among employees.
“All the studies show there is far more work-related stress today than there used to be and that the stress is constant,” said Benoit Hamon, a Socialist member of Parliament, to the BBC. “The texts, the messages, the emails they colonize the life of the individual to the point where he or she eventually breaks down.”
It’s not the first time a bill of this nature has been proposed. It’s similar to legislation that was introduced but never made it to the books in both France and Germany. France’s most recent bill, however, is the closest an after-work email ban has come to becoming an actual law.
Gillian Symon, who studies the way modern people switch between the digital and corporate world, applauds the legislation for placing the responsibility of balancing work and life on the bosses rather than the employees. She said that her research with Digital Brain Switch, an interdisciplinary project that combines research from several UK universities, has found that the implications of putting the onus of answering work emails on employees can have devastating emotional effects.
“There was much guilt, as you might expect as people felt concerned about whether they should ignore work or their family, again putting all the responsibility for the ‘choice’ on employees,” she told The Washington Post.
But both Symon and Jon Whittle, another researcher at Digital Brain Trust, fear that the law does not get to the root of the issue. It sometimes can be more stressful, they say, for an employee to power down their device because of the slew of emails that could be waiting for them in the morning. “I think the topic of work-related well-being is much larger than simply stopping email after-hours,” said Whittle. “Email is just a medium used to communicate. The real problem is the culture of having to constantly do more and constantly do better than competitors.”
This fear of being left behind by the competition is expressed by some workers. “In my company, we compete with Indian, Chinese, American developers. We need to talk to people around the world late into the night,” a software coder named Gregory told the BBC. “Our competitors don’t have the same restrictions. If we obeyed this law we would just be shooting ourselves in the foot.”
But Whittle of Digital Brain Trust is quick to point out that a workplace that prioritizes well-being among workers promotes better work. “Having a happy and stress-free workforce can provide a competitive advantage,” he said. “The culture of expecting people to be always connected and always on will not necessarily lead to a competitive advantage; it could just lead to burnout and losing top-performing staff.”
The bill will journey to the Senate next, where it will be reviewed, before going back to the National Assembly for final passage. It’s been highly contested since its introduction, specifically for its legislative rollbacks to the country’s prized labor code that protects employee rights. Despite the the bill’s controversy, the after-work email ban has been largely popular among President Francois Hollande’s Socialist Party.
Indian govt is tracking online shopping on Flipkart, Amazon, Snapdeal. No, nothing is illegal here
As the Indian e-commerce is growing and the online retailing market is projected to hit $69 billion in 2020, the RBI is mulling to include it while calculating the consumer price index (CPI).
The Statistics Ministry is planning to monitor discounts on Amazon,Flipkart and Snapdeal in this regard.
CPI is a prime indicator for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to determine the monetary policy.
“Online shopping is not in our CPI basket now and since price movements may be different for a few items as compared to the regular shopping, we may include some of them as we find there is a scope for improving the basket,” an official told ET.
The ministry is looking at price movements at various sites due to discounts offered by them.
Last year, the Central Statistics Office revised the CPI base year from 2010 to 2012 to make it consistent with the international practice of shorter reference periods for most food articles and longer reference periods for items of infrequent consumption and purchase.
India’s retail inflation eased to 5.18% in February compared with 5.69% in January and 5.37% a year ago.
[Source:- Businessinsider]
Sony Music Entertainment has partnered with Dubset, a rights clearance startup, to become the first label allowing rights holders to earn money from unofficial remixes.
What this means is that Sony’s catalogue will be indexed by Dubset so that an artist can earn money from unofficial remixes, edits and even samples of their music through plays on streaming platforms.
Dubset has the ability to identify material by fingerprinting audio for its Mixbank. This allows it to recognize all unofficial uploads, remixes, edits and samples found on platforms like Youtube. The company then distributes royalties accordingly. Earlier this year Dubset also acquired $4 million Series A funding, which allows it to receive a cut of Sony’s royalties.
Dubset CEO Stephen White told TechCrunch how important the company is to the music industry: “700 million people are listening to mixed content every month… If rights holders don’t embrace a platform like us, the content is going to flow anyway and it’s going to flow around them.”
According to TechCrunch, Dubset is also close to signing similar deals with the two other major record labels, Universal and Warner. This could allow all unofficial remixes and edits to be hosted on streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple Music, without the content being removed due to copyright infringement. The deal may have have a negative impact Soundcloud, which is viewed as a unique place for producers to upload unofficial material. Spotify, Apple Music and other major streaming platforms would become the ideal place to host all content, even unofficial remixes, due to their large user base.
Judging by this information, all signs point to Dubset revolutionizing the media streaming industry. And if this means tracks won’t get removed from streaming platforms due to copyright infringement, it’s promising for all content creators.
[“Source-mixmag”]